18 posts tagged with "models"

Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5: Opus 5 wins nearly every eval at half the price. Where Fable 5 still leads, the retention gap, and which to pick.

Claude Opus 5 benchmarks, pricing, and specs: $5/$25 unchanged from Opus 4.8, near-Fable 5 results, thinking on by default, and a new max effort.

GLM 5.2 vs Opus 4.8 vs Sonnet 5: the only clean benchmark comparisons, why cross-vendor numbers mislead, pricing, open weights, and which to use.

GLM 5.2 is Z.ai's open-weights MIT model: 753B MoE, 1M context, $1.40/$4.40 API. Benchmarks, self-host reality, and how it stacks up vs Claude.

Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 compared: Opus leads coding and reasoning by 0.5 to 6.6 points; Sonnet 5 ties knowledge work at ~40% less cost.

Claude Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% agentic coding at $2/$10 per million tokens (intro), closing the gap with Opus 4.8. Specs, benchmarks, pricing.

GPT-5.6 (Sol, Terra, Luna) is now generally available. Pricing, per-plan access, the launch-day reception, and how Sol compares to Claude.

Claude Fable 5 benchmarks: state of the art on coding, finance, physics, and vision. Specs, the Mythos 5 split, safety, and release details.

Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing ($5/$25 per 1M tokens), benchmarks, specs, and whether it is free. Grounded in Anthropic's official release.

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Sonnet 4.5, and Haiku 4.5. Specs, benchmarks, smart model switching, and migration paths to current Claude models.

Opus 4.7 beats GPT-5.4 on SWE-bench Pro by 6.6 points. Full comparison: coding, tools, vision, pricing, agentic reliability.

Opus 4.7 adds 3x vision resolution, xhigh effort, stricter instruction-following, and 70% CursorBench. Same $5/$25 pricing.